Blog

At Scout Labs, we’re on Twitter every day a few times every day a lot. I’d consider us to be “Twitter savvy.” We’re looking for mentions of @Scoutlabs, Scout Labs, @LithiumTech, our competitors, a few hash tags. I respond. I engage. I re-Tweet. I even wrote a blog post about why people should be on Twitter to begin with. You can’t stop me.

We have “rules of engagement” and policies that keep us from blasting our stream with messages that come across with message that is too “sales oriented” and with the “right tone.” We’ve thought it out, have a lot of eyes watching it and rarely miss a mention that includes something we care about. I typically use my @erinkoro account for Tweets from me and throw in a @scoutlabs when its work related. Come on, we preach this stuff every day and walk the walk. Or Tweet the Tweet (couldn’t resist).

So today, I had an interaction with @chadarizona on Twitter that made me really think. Here’s the series of Tweets:

Gulp. I have an elevator pitch down. I know our competitive advantages. I can demo the hell out of Scout Labs. BUT - What is my 140 character description of Scout Labs?? (Actually, less then 140 because I needed room for @chadarizona in the message).

I had a live one. He was in my grips. This is a sales person’s dream. I even managed not to come off too much like a sales person. Sort of. But once I had @chadarizona’s attention, I had to really think about what I wanted to say. I was away from my computer, on my iphone, couldn’t use a bit.ly link to send him to some of our content - I had to just go for it. Here’s what I came up with:

Grrr. There’s a typo. And if I gave it some thought, I’d probably refine this a little bit. But what I got out of it was much more then just the opportunity to work with Chad. I got a little wake up call that if I’m going to use Twitter for lead generation, then I better have my Twitter pitch down.

So that brings me to a question for you - what’s your Twitter pitch? Have at it - you got 140 characters, baby.

You might be wondering, “what happened?!” Well I got about as much as I could hope for - first by having an actual “conversation” with a prospect via Twitter and secondly, @chadarizona’s interest. THANKS @chadarizona, I’m looking forward to working with you!

Last Thursday I spoke on a panel at BlogWorldExpo (#bwe09) entitled “Social Secure-ity: Managing Your Brand’s Online Reputation.” Audience questions drove the discussion; I managed to jot down some of the audience questions/ panelist responses and have compiled them below. In my role at Scout Labs, I have seen a wide range of corporate responses to these questions, as I’m sure had the other panel participants- Connie Bensen of Techrigy, Amber Naslund http://altitudebranding.com/ of Radian6, Melyssa Plunkett-Gomez of Crimson Hexagon, and Aubrey Podolsky of Sysomos.

Thinking back on it later in the day, a lot of this advice just isn’t useful with some resources and corporate commitment to social media- and from the tone of many of the questions, resources and commitment are still an issue. There’s no doubt that social media is here to stay whether or not companies want to “formulate a response.” The real question is which companies are going to recognize that better understanding their customers through social media is a source of competitive advantage- whether they decide to turn Twitter into a customer service channel or not.

From a travel industry representative from Las Vegas: How should we deal with negative criticism? How should we respond to it?

• There will always be negative criticism. Develop a framework for what you need to respond to from a business perspective, and try not the take the rest too personally.


• There are trolls and there are people with genuine issues. You can’t please the trolls, so don’t try.


• Your social media presence can and should be about more than damage control to the brand.


• Let the community respond on your behalf.


• Get ahead of the negative criticism- change the business so that consumers aren’t complaining!

David Spinks, a community manager, asked about the importance of responding to content on sidewiki:

• The sources of feedback are multiplying and will continue to do so. Very few brand manager have the time to respond to every single last comment anyone has ever made on any platform. If Sidewiki gets more traction in the market, vendors like the ones on the panel will eventually help marketers figure out how to track and respond to it. Right now it’s a small blip on a crowded radar screen.

A gentleman who works for a hedge fund asked what to when everyone hates you:

• Having a social media presence can help humanize the brand or the industry, and demystify what it is that hedge funds do for the economy


• Whose opinion are you trying to influence, and why? Make sure you know and have the resources to follow through before you set your social media strategy- there are some inconsistent, useless attempts at building a community out there, and they’re not helping the brands they represent


• If you do something for your community that does not directly serve your own interest- for instance publishing free analyst repots- it build brand goodwill


• If they care enough to hate you, they may care enough to love you. There are things the company does that would help them to love you. Make people aware of them.

Kat French asked for thoughts on what to do about clients who only focus on the negative:

• Reframe the conversation through competitive analyses- what do people love or hate about your competitors? It’s myopic to only focus on the negative posts about your own brand


• Another way to reframe is to focus on the positive- what is it that customers like about the brand? What strengths can the brand build on? This is the long term strategic response to negative feedback- not just a crisis communications plan

Tracy Schmidt from ChicagoNow asked a question about policies for employee participation in social media:

• Have a policy in place helps guide employee behavior- and know that there will still be problems. Be prepared to deal with them as decisively as any other personnel problem


• Employees are trusted to have email addresses and phones- they are already representing the company. Employee behavior is a hiring and training issue, not a social media issue. If an employee can’t be trusted, they can’t be trusted


• Employee trust is an enormous issue for every organization. Social media is forcing massive organizational changes on companies, ones that are really challenging for managers and employees. This is a big change for everyone involved and training is crucial.

Last was a great question on how to deal with franchises, where much feedback comes about individual franchisees that impacts the overall brand:

• Monitoring customer satisfaction/ ability to meet corporate requirements is already a part of franchising. Extending that to social media will become a corporate function.

And Lacey Kemp from Seattle, I got your name but not your question- ask it again here and I’ll do my best to answer you!

I found it encouraging that there were a fair number of B2B marketers at the session- leveraging social media is just as crucial for them as it is for the B2C brands, if not more so, and they rarely get the same level of media love.

Some other memorable sessions at BlogWorldExpo were the ROI smackdown- very smart thinking and good examples from Deb Micek, Rob Kay, Beth Harte, and Stephanie Agresta- and the Real Time Web session from the ever thoughtful Louis Grey. The sessions were all taped and will theoretically available online at the conference site but I don’t see the links up yet. Much thanks to Jason Falls for organizing.

There is a lot of confusion out there. Many of the posts and tweets about social media monitoring and brand monitoring these days are asking, “What application should I use? Which app is the best? Who has used what? What do you think?” Very often, the RFPs I receive and the questions I am asked about our platform are pretty surface-skimming. “Does it have Twitter?” is a fine question, but there are so many more tough questions you should be asking all of us.

Don’t even ask me which platform is best. You already know my answer is Scout Labs. I have no credibility there. But, having thought about this and worked on the technology for nearly 3 years, I do think I have credibility in offering up a checklist of things to look for and to think about if you are choosing a social media analysis platform for your company. I will get the list started but I hope that you will add your own thoughts:

1. How many months of live data are you serving in the application? (I need to be able to read all the posts and also see trending graphs).
2. Do you price based on the number of results returned or otherwise limit the number of results that I can see? Or do you return all the search results for my topics?
3. What social media content types do you index?
4. Can I add sources if I don’t see them in your app? How fast does it take to see them in results?
5. How good are your spam filters? What percentage are your algorithms catching as compared to human-scores? How often do you mis-classify something as spam?
6. If you say its spam, can I see what you filtered out? Can I add them back in to my main results?
7. Can I curate the results for my team? E.g. If I think a result is either irrelevant or spam, can I flag it as such and will it be instantly removed from the results?
8. Can I order mentions within a given date range by importance - what’s most important to pay attention to - or is it just by date?
9. What sentiment-related features do you offer? Is it just positive and negative scoring, or can you identify other customer emotions?
10. With regard to sentiment (positive / negative / neutral) how accurate are your sentiment scores? Specifically, how often does your algorithm agree with human scorers? When is the last time you tested your algorithm versus human scores?
11. How are you improving your algorithms over time?
12. Do you do only go-forward sentiment scoring (as posts come in, after you create a search)?
13. Or can you back-fill sentiment scores for old things that were posted before I created my search? If so, is there an addition charge for backfill? How long does it take to back-fill sentiment for all my searches?
14. Does the application support multiple people / departments and groups in the company? Is it easy to add people? How much do you charge additional users or is it free?
15. Is there a way to “bookmark” and tag interesting content as my team finds things and people that we want to remember?
16. Can I annotate things I see with my own commentary and tags, so that my colleagues can see my thoughts?
17. From when a customer posts to when it is live in your application, what is the lag time (by media type)?
18. How long does it take for a dashboard to populate from search creation?
19. Is everything totally automated or do you have your analysts or outsourced labor doing some part of it?
20. How much honing and set-up of the results need to happen to get really good results?
21. How much training time would you say is required to become an expert at using the system?
22. What is the average number of users that are using your platform within a typical company. One? Twenty?
23. How do you price? What’s the cost for an addition person to get access? Is there any limit on the number of search results that you return to me?
24. If you do limit the number of searches that you return to me, (e.g. 10,000) and I do a search on “Google”, say, that clearly has far more than 10,000 results, what do subset do you show me? What am I not seeing?

We don’t mind the softball-inquiries when they are thrown to us. But we know that Scout Labs stands up to very rigorous scrutiny, so bring it on. I hope this makes you a more sophisticated reviewer of platforms and writer of RFPs. I also hope that this forces more data into the discussion about social media platforms and raises the level of discourse throughout the category.